Updates and Debate Concerning Margin Adequacy and Management following Breast-Conserving Surgery
نویسندگان
چکیده
Objective: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) experienced a significant surge during the last decades due to increase of early breast cancer detection. Central discussion is margin adequacy which represents one most predictive factors for local relapse. This paper aims shed light on problem margins in surgery. Mechanism: We performed systematic narrative review literature by conducting search using Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. The following keywords were considered: “breast-conserving surgery” AND “margins”/“margin”. Findings Brief: In case invasive cancer, “no ink tumor” can be considered an adequate margin, while ductal carcinoma situ (DCIS), distance 2 mm from tumor should obtained. Many novel tools have been developed based both latest radiological imaging techniques tissue expression certain markers, with aim precise navigation excision intraoperative evaluation cavity margins. Oncoplastic oncologically safe improving cosmetic outcome patients’ quality life. appropriate use adjuvant treatments context multidisciplinary personalized management only means omit second intervention some carefully selected cases. Conclusions: Debate still exists concerning definition clear BCS DCIS. Further studies are required better assess multimodal treatment approaches this condition.
منابع مشابه
Intraoperative radiological margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery.
UNLABELLED A prospective study was lead in order to analyze the accuracy of an X-ray device settled in the operating room for margin assessment, when performing breast-conserving surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred and seventy patients were included. All lesions were visible on the preoperative mammograms. An intraoperative X-ray of the lumpectomy specimen was systematically performed f...
متن کاملImaging Results Following Oncoplastic and Standard Breast Conserving Surgery.
BACKGROUND Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) requires more complex surgical techniques than standard wide local excision (WLE) and the postoperative complication rate may be higher. Since these can have an impact on postoperative imaging, we compared imaging and biopsy results after OBCS and WLE. METHODS Findings for patients undergoing OBCS (n = 83) or standard WLE (n = 128) were ...
متن کاملAccelerated partial breast irradiation: potential roles following breast-conserving surgery.
BACKGROUND Multiple randomized trials comparing mastectomy to lumpectomy and whole breast irradiation (WBI) have shown equivalent survival outcomes in early-stage breast cancer. WBI requires a treatment course of several weeks, which has resulted in limited access to breast-conserving therapy in certain populations. A shorter accelerated course of partial breast irradiation (APBI) has been inve...
متن کاملRisk Factors for Re-Excision Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To identify previously unstudied factors predicting re-excision following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and to assess the feasibility of obtaining data about breast density for predictive modeling. . DESIGN Retrospective secondary data analysis. . SETTING Data were obtained from the cancer registry and electronic health records (EHRs) at Texas Health Harris Methodist Ho...
متن کاملThe Practice Patterns and Perceptions of Korean Surgeons Regarding Margin Status after Breast-Conserving Surgery
Two consecutive surveys for breast surgeons in Korea were conducted to comprehend the practice patterns and perceptions on margin status after breast-conserving surgery. The surveys were conducted online in 2014 (initial) and 2016 (follow-up). A total of 126 and 88 responses were obtained in the initial and follow-up survey, respectively. More than 80% of the respondents replied to routinely ap...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0390-6663', '2709-0094']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog4912268